Timeline for implementation

This page provides you with an implementation timeline of PRIIPs and highlights of the key updates in this process.

PRIIPs implementation timeline

PRIIPs implementation timeline and key dates.

December 29, 2014

Regulation came into force

March 2015

First phase of consumer testing of presentation options for KID

June 23, 2015

Discussion Paper on methodologically complex aspects of RTS (eg risk indicator)

November 11, 2015

Consultation Paper and draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS)

April 7, 2016

Submission of final draft RTS to European Comission

June 30, 2016

Commission adopted the final draft RTS in slightly amended form

September 14, 2016

Final draft RTS rejected by the European Parliament

November 9, 2016

Commission announce delay to PRIIPs

November 10, 2016

Commission release draft amendment to RTS

December 24, 2016

Delay passed into law

January 1, 2018

Proposed date of application of the Regulation

 
First phase of consumer testing of presentation options for KID
March 2015

Regulation came into force

First phase of consumer testing of presentation options for KID

Discussion Paper on methodologically complex aspects of RTS (eg risk indicator)

Consultation Paper and draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS)

Submission of final draft RTS to European Comission

Commission adopted the final draft RTS in slightly amended form

Final draft RTS rejected by the European Parliament

Commission announce delay to PRIIPs

Commission release draft amendment to RTS

Delay passed into law

Proposed date of application of the Regulation

2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Feb.
March
April
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.

The European Parliament rejects the final draft RTS

On 14th September 2016, the full European Parliament voted at its plenary session in Strasbourg to reject the Commission’s RTS on PRIIPs.

The European Parliament, in its resolution:

  • objected to the Commission’s RTS
  • instructed its President to forward the resolution to the Commission and to notify the Commission that the RTS cannot enter into force
  • called on the Commission to submit a new delegated act which takes account of the concerns in the resolution
  • called on the Commission to consider a proposal postponing the application date of the PRIIPs Regulation to ensure a smooth implementation of the requirements set out in the Regulation and the delegated regulation, and avoid the application of the PRIIPs Regulation without the RTS being in force in advance, and
  • instructed its President to forward the resolution to the Council and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
    It now remains to be seen what action will be taken by the European Commission and whether the implementation date of the PRIIPs Regulation will be delayed or whether the Commission will submit a new RTS quickly to address the concerns set out in the resolution. If the PRIIPs Regulation is not delayed and applies from 31 December 2016 without the RTS being in force, this will lead to huge uncertainty in how the provisions of the PRIIPs Regulation should be interpreted and applied.

European Commission delays PRIIPs Regulation

On 09 November 2016, the European Commission announced a 12 month delay to the PRIIPs Regulation, which was passed into law on 24 Decemeber 2016 and will come into force on 01 January 2018.

This decision comes after months of debate, culminating in the vote from the European Parliament to reject the current regulatory technical standards. A 12 month delay to the PRIIPs Regulation was supported by many in the industry and most of the EU member states, including the UK, France, Germany and Ireland.

This delay will bring the implementation date of the PRIIPs Regulation in line with that of MiFID2 (which in itself eliminates certain issues such as how to interpret the definition of retail investor in PRIIPs which cross-refers to the MiFID2 definition) and provide much needed time for firms to implement the regime and consider further the significant number of open issues that have been raised by the industry.

This document (and any information accessed through links in this document) is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from any action as a result of the contents of this document.